Pepe ja tema seiklused mudases kosmoses
Moderaator: Moderators
- totu
- I live off from the mud
- Postitusi: 2863
- Liitunud: N Sept 06, 2007 8:26 pm
- Asukoht: Kallavere, kui just ära ei ole.
Re: TR3 H5
Teistesse klassidesse sai, minuteada, keemilise laadimise keeld sisse, kolmedele mitte. Aga jah, keemiline ülelaadimine lisab hapnikku, mitte õhku.Praks1 kirjutas:Kirjas ju, et õhu ülelaadimine on lubatud, mitte keemiline ülelaadimine.
Kui Hardo tagasi jõuab, tõstab selle mootoriheietuse ehk "muu möla" lahtrisse, seniks risustame tema autoehituse teemat isuga.
Tehtud, mõeldud.
- Movistar
- Teel kaaluta olekusse
- Postitusi: 4423
- Liitunud: L Dets 30, 2006 2:05 am
- Asukoht: Tallinn
- Kontakt:
Re: TR3 H5
Las veel olla. Läkski lõbusaks üle pika aja.
Tehnilistest reeglitest võiks küll rohkem mitte rääkida.
Aga muidu, Kosmose mees hoiab teemat hästi soojas
Tehnilistest reeglitest võiks küll rohkem mitte rääkida.
Aga muidu, Kosmose mees hoiab teemat hästi soojas
HM Racing Team
-
- Rookie
- Postitusi: 10
- Liitunud: E Apr 18, 2016 8:53 pm
Re: TR3 H5
"Watts" are a measure of power, much like horsepower. "Watts" alone are not speed, because a watt does not include a defined application time. A watt is only power level, or work level, of energy over an undefined time.
If we include one hour's time we would have a watt-hour. Kilowatt-hours, watt-seconds, watt-hours, and other combinations of power level and time define electrical energy or work. This is why we billed for kilowatt-hours at our homes! If we were billed for plain old "watts", it would not tell anyone how much "work" we bought. Watts are a true scalar (single dimension) measure of ability to do work, just as horsepower is. Both indicate a force or the ability to do work, but both lack any inclusion of work time, so we have no idea how much work was done, or could be done.
Horsepower is a function of RPM and torque, just like watts are volts times amperes. Horsepower is an ability to do useful work, but doing actual work requires time. Torque is pressure, and since it does not include speed it is not a very useful measure of system power or the ability to accelerate or move weight. Despite what we hear, crankshaft torque is not directly related to moving something off the line or pulling a heavy load. Up at the engine, it is really all about horsepower. The horsepower (torque at a certain RPM) is eventually converted through gears and other mechanical devices to a new torque value at a different RPM. Eventually all we care about is the rotational pressure on the contact patch of our tires that thrusts our car forward. A 800 lb/ft torque at 2000 RPM engine does not accelerate a vehicle as well as a 400 lb/ft engine at 5000 RPM, because horsepower is a product of torque and RPM. The higher RPM engine can be geared to provide more forward pressure at the wheels. The higher RPM engine, with less torque, has more horsepower.
If you notice, ET calculators don't ask for torque. This is because torque does not quantify the ability to do work. ET calculators ask for horsepower, because horsepower clearly defines an ability to do work.
Joules are another common measure of ability to do work. A joule includes both time and force (pressure). A single joule is one watt-second, or the equivalent of one watt applied for one second. A single joule could be 10 watts applied for 1/10th of a second (10*1/10 = 1), the product of time and force only has to be ONE watt-second to make one joule. If we applied TWO watts for 1/2 second, we have the same work. Two watts for 1/2 second is one joule (2*1/2=1).
Horsepower can also be stated in kilowatts. One horsepower is approximately 0.7457 kilowatts, or 745.7 watts (the exact value is 0.745699872 kilowatts). This means 746 watts for one second is 746 joules and that is one horsepower-second! One kilowatt is 1.341 horsepower.
If we include one hour's time we would have a watt-hour. Kilowatt-hours, watt-seconds, watt-hours, and other combinations of power level and time define electrical energy or work. This is why we billed for kilowatt-hours at our homes! If we were billed for plain old "watts", it would not tell anyone how much "work" we bought. Watts are a true scalar (single dimension) measure of ability to do work, just as horsepower is. Both indicate a force or the ability to do work, but both lack any inclusion of work time, so we have no idea how much work was done, or could be done.
Horsepower is a function of RPM and torque, just like watts are volts times amperes. Horsepower is an ability to do useful work, but doing actual work requires time. Torque is pressure, and since it does not include speed it is not a very useful measure of system power or the ability to accelerate or move weight. Despite what we hear, crankshaft torque is not directly related to moving something off the line or pulling a heavy load. Up at the engine, it is really all about horsepower. The horsepower (torque at a certain RPM) is eventually converted through gears and other mechanical devices to a new torque value at a different RPM. Eventually all we care about is the rotational pressure on the contact patch of our tires that thrusts our car forward. A 800 lb/ft torque at 2000 RPM engine does not accelerate a vehicle as well as a 400 lb/ft engine at 5000 RPM, because horsepower is a product of torque and RPM. The higher RPM engine can be geared to provide more forward pressure at the wheels. The higher RPM engine, with less torque, has more horsepower.
If you notice, ET calculators don't ask for torque. This is because torque does not quantify the ability to do work. ET calculators ask for horsepower, because horsepower clearly defines an ability to do work.
Joules are another common measure of ability to do work. A joule includes both time and force (pressure). A single joule is one watt-second, or the equivalent of one watt applied for one second. A single joule could be 10 watts applied for 1/10th of a second (10*1/10 = 1), the product of time and force only has to be ONE watt-second to make one joule. If we applied TWO watts for 1/2 second, we have the same work. Two watts for 1/2 second is one joule (2*1/2=1).
Horsepower can also be stated in kilowatts. One horsepower is approximately 0.7457 kilowatts, or 745.7 watts (the exact value is 0.745699872 kilowatts). This means 746 watts for one second is 746 joules and that is one horsepower-second! One kilowatt is 1.341 horsepower.
Viimati muutis PepeCosmos, N Apr 21, 2016 1:37 am, muudetud 1 kord kokku.
- Movistar
- Teel kaaluta olekusse
- Postitusi: 4423
- Liitunud: L Dets 30, 2006 2:05 am
- Asukoht: Tallinn
- Kontakt:
Re: TR3 H5
Mees kes nii suuri sõnu ritta seab,äkki tutvustab ennast ,et kes ta on selline ....
7 postitusega Pepe Kosmosest ei ütle eriti midagi . Mulkidega on asi muidugi keerulisem.
7 postitusega Pepe Kosmosest ei ütle eriti midagi . Mulkidega on asi muidugi keerulisem.
HM Racing Team
Re: TR3 H5
Pepe kas sul läks rakett rikki, et foorumis maandusid ja kohe ühe teema ülesse kaevasid, ning oma fantaasia villa puistama hakkasid?
Räägi mis mootoriga raketiga liigud, aitame korda teha ja saad edasi liikuda
Räägi mis mootoriga raketiga liigud, aitame korda teha ja saad edasi liikuda
56157755
- Movistar
- Teel kaaluta olekusse
- Postitusi: 4423
- Liitunud: L Dets 30, 2006 2:05 am
- Asukoht: Tallinn
- Kontakt:
Re: Pepe ja tema seiklused mudases kosmoses
Tundub, et miski võttis kõhu lahti ja kõikidest postitustest on tarkus öösel ära kustutatud,peale esimese mida muuta ei saa.
HM Racing Team
-
- Rookie
- Postitusi: 10
- Liitunud: E Apr 18, 2016 8:53 pm
Re: Pepe ja tema seiklused mudases kosmoses
Oh ei.Lihtsalt üle võlli keeratud musta huumori sulest sai tint otsa ja päris tola ei taha ka mängida.Küsimusi võib ikka esitada aga selle tagajärjel võiks tekkida argumenteeritud sõbralik vestlus.
- Movistar
- Teel kaaluta olekusse
- Postitusi: 4423
- Liitunud: L Dets 30, 2006 2:05 am
- Asukoht: Tallinn
- Kontakt:
Re: Pepe ja tema seiklused mudases kosmoses
Jäi mulje, et sul on mingi kana kitkuda kellegiga.
Kellega, ei saanudki selgeks.
Kellega, ei saanudki selgeks.
HM Racing Team
Re: Pepe ja tema seiklused mudases kosmoses
Kui tint ainult otsa sai ja avastasid,et klahvidele vajutades jäid järgi vaid valged jäljed, siis miks kustutada eelnevat eepost???Niimoodi surebki ajalugu välja.
Ühesõnaga võiks kaotada selle teksti muutmise võimaluse siit. Või saaks muuta enne järgmist posti, aga mitte tagasiulatuvalt.
Oleks lihtne hiljem tuvastada, kes on Guuru,kes Pepe jne jne teravad pärlid.
Ühesõnaga võiks kaotada selle teksti muutmise võimaluse siit. Või saaks muuta enne järgmist posti, aga mitte tagasiulatuvalt.
Oleks lihtne hiljem tuvastada, kes on Guuru,kes Pepe jne jne teravad pärlid.
Proto
53951597
53951597
- MetsaVikat
- Rock Crawler
- Postitusi: 872
- Liitunud: P Nov 23, 2008 4:23 pm
- Asukoht: Hiiumaa
Re: Pepe ja tema seiklused mudases kosmoses
Võiks teha küll nii, aga äkki saab nii, et ostu müügi jne. teemadel saab muuta, sest tihti, kes rohkem asju müüvad, muudavad oma esimest postitust jne. või vaja lisada esimesse postitusse nr või muu kontakt info. Lihtsalt hommikune mõte selline.
- Movistar
- Teel kaaluta olekusse
- Postitusi: 4423
- Liitunud: L Dets 30, 2006 2:05 am
- Asukoht: Tallinn
- Kontakt:
Re: Pepe ja tema seiklused mudases kosmoses
Kui pepe tegi esimese postituse siis ma panin selle lukku,et muuta ei saaks,kuna post oli ilus pähkel ja arvasin,et kainenedes kustutab raudselt ära. Selleparast see esimene muutmata ongi.Praks1 kirjutas:Kui tint ainult otsa sai ja avastasid,et klahvidele vajutades jäid järgi vaid valged jäljed, siis miks kustutada eelnevat eepost???Niimoodi surebki ajalugu välja.
Ühesõnaga võiks kaotada selle teksti muutmise võimaluse siit. Või saaks muuta enne järgmist posti, aga mitte tagasiulatuvalt.
Oleks lihtne hiljem tuvastada, kes on Guuru,kes Pepe jne jne teravad pärlid.
Oleks pidanud teistega sama tegema aga tundus,et kaine peaga tuleb sama jutt ja ei näinud põhjust.
HM Racing Team